Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:41252 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37038 of 2024 Petitioner :- Neelam Vishwakarma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amish Kumar Srivastava,Ranjeet Verma Counsel for Respondent :- Adarsh Kumar Shukla,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- " Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 11.09.2024 passed by Respondent No.2, (Annexed Annexure No. 8 to the writ petition). (b). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus staying the entire proceeding pending in the court of Respondent No. 2 in Computrized Case No. T202414360205109 U/S 35(2) of U.P. Rvenue Code, 2006 Mauza-Sarokhanpur, Pargana-Rari, Tehsil-Badlapur, District Jaunpur in between Ambhi @ Abbhi Vs. Neelam." 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that against the order passed under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, respondents have preferred a restoration application as well as an appeal. In the memo of appeal, it has been disclosed that the restoration application is pending. Despite their being a disclosure that restoration application is pending, the Appellate Court have not considered the same and allowed the appeal. 4. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel that against the order impugned, petitioner has remedy of filing a revision under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 5. In view of the same, I am not inclined to interfere with the matter. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy, as available to him, under the law. Order Date :- 19.3.2025 Rishabh [Manish Kumar Nigam, J.] Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad