SARTAJ ALI @ SIRAJ AHMAD v. State of UP AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/36332/2024 · 2025-02-17
Vikram D Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 106060 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 106060 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:22794 Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36332 of 2024 Petitioner :- Sartaj Ali @ Siraj Ahmad Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharm Vir Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:
"1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the
order dated 08.04.2024 passed by Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue) District Etah in appeal no.325 of 2021 Satendra Singh versus Sartaj Ali @ Siraj Ahmad."
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that by impugned order, respondent no.2 had directed the registration of sale deed by order dated 8.4.2024.
4. It is not in dispute between the parties that in compliance of
order dated 8.4.2024, sale deed has already been registered on 30.5.2024 and the present writ petition was filed in September,
2024. Admittedly, prior filing of writ petition, the sale deed has been registered. Once the document is registered, the same can only be cancelled by a competent civil court more particularly when the stand of petitioner is that he has not received sale
consideration. Such dispute is a question of fact which cannot be gone into writ jurisdiction.
5. At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to seek his remedy before competent civil court.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
Order Date :- 18.2.2025 D. Tamang Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad