IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.2604 of 2023 Decided on: 10th January, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jitender Kumar …..Petitioner Versus The Managing Director, H.P. Tourism Development Corporation Limited and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rathore, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Even though the respondents have not filed reply, however, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 2. Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to consider his case for regularization from the date when the private respondents were ordered to be regularized with all consequential benefits. A further prayer has been made to direct the respondents to consider and decide his representation dated 27.10.2022 (Annexure P-1). 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondents No.1 and 2 have already granted the benefits as prayed for by the petitioner in the case of one Sh. Shyam Lal, i.e. Shyam Lal Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another2. That the petitioner is also seeking the similar benefits as have been allowed by the respondents to aforesaid Sh. Shyam Lal. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case respondent No.1/competent authority is directed to consider and decide petitioner’s representation (Annexure P-1) in light of the aforesaid decision rendered in Shyam Lal’s2 case within a time bound schedule. Learned counsel appearing for respondents No.1 and 2 is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 27.10.2022 (Annexure P-1) in accordance with law as also keeping in view the decision rendered in the case of Shyam Lal2, within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. 2 CWP No.6667 of 2023, decided on 09.12.2024 3 The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua January 10, 2025 Judge Mukesh