Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10597 (CHH)

VISHNU DEWANGAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1117/2025 · 2025-02-28

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:9986 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1117 of 2025 1 - Vishnu Dewangan S/o Mohan Dewangan Aged About 41 Years R/o House No. 142, Ward No. 30, Near Lalak Mandir, Khursipar Bhilai, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chief Medical And Health OfÏcer District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Station House OfÏcer Police Station Supela District Durg, Chhattisgarh. SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.03.03 21:02:54 +0530 2 5 - Station House OfÏcer Police Station Khursipar District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Senior Medical OfÏcer Government Hospital, Supela, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Jitendra Gupta, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Shri Anmol Sharma, Panel lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 28.02.2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the respondent to compensate the petitioner pursuance to circular of the State Government dated 09.06.2015 (Annexure P/4) as the son of the petitioner aged about 12 years died on 15.11.2019. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though there is provision of financial health up to 4 lakhs, but 1lakh has been disbursed to the petitioner on 16.06.2020. Learned counsel further submit that the petitioner has submitted a representation to the Collector on 01.07.2020 seeking further financial help, however the respondents have not taken any decision on the application filed by him. 3 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that if the application dated 01.07.2020 is still pending before the Collector, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the provision enumerated in the circular dated 09.06.2015 within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard both the parties and without commenting on the merit of the case as the petitioner has approached the Collector by an application dated 01.07.2020, the Collector, Durg is directed to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner within a period of 50 days in accordance with the provision and guidelines made in the circular of the State Government dated 09.06.2015 (Annexure P/4). The petitioner is at liberty to apprise the order of the Court to the Collector. 5. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib