Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 105952 (ALL)

M/S GOLDEN INDIA VENEER UDHYOG v. State of UP AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/36350/2024 · 2025-04-10

Shekhar B Saraf, Y K Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:53606-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36350 of 2024 Petitioner :- M/S Golden India Veneer Udhyog Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Braham Singh,Sushil Kumar Tewari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dhananjay Awasthi Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner has prayed for the following substantial reliefs: "a. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents not to withdraw the increased rates of timber logs and supply the timber logs to petitioner on its tender bids, as accepted and approved at the time of e-auction proceeding. b. To issue a writ, order of direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to comply with the outcome of the e- auction proceedings and permit the petitioner to get the timber logs on the price of tender bids as early as possible within stipulated period." 3. Upon perusal of the record and after hearing counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, we are of the view that the petitioner should approach the respondent No.3 by way of filing a fresh representation, which should be considered by the said authority. 4. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation before the respondent No.3/ General Manager (Marketing), U.P. Forest Corporation, Arnya Vikas Bhawan, 21/475, Indira Nagar Lucknow within a period of two weeks from date. In the event such a representation is filed within the time specified above, the respondent No.3 is directed to grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, and thereafter, decide the said representation by way of passing a reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of filing of the fresh representation. 5. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 11.4.2025 Abhishek Sri. (Dr. Y.K.Srivastava,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK RANJAN SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad