Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 105951 (ALL)

SIDDARTH RAI v. State of U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/36212/2024 · 2025-02-13

Vikram D Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:20238 Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36212 of 2024 Petitioner :- Siddarth Rai Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Kumar Mishra,Sudhir Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: "A. Issue a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 to ensure the preliminary inquiry concluded within stipulated period. B. Issue a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 to decide the petitioner representation dated 17.7.2024." 3. Learned Standing Counsel, on instructions, submits that show cause notice has already been issued to Gram Pradhan and others. A copy of the order of competent authority has been provided to learned counsel for petitioner. 4. In view of the fact that already show cause notice has been issued, the writ petition does not survives at this stage. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous at this stage. Order Date :- 13.2.2025 D. Tamang Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad