GHULAM HASSAN YATOO AND ANR. v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS. (REVENUE)
WP(C)/1616/2024 · 2025-12-15
Rajesh Sekhri
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10592 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10592 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 42 Regular Cause list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1616/2024 CM(4375/2024) c/w i) WP(C) 1532/2025 CM(3923/2025) CM(7463/2025) GHULAM HASSAN YATOO AND ANR. …Appellant(s)/Petitioners(s) Through: Mr. Gulzar Ahmad Bhat with Ms. Shaira, Advocate
Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS. (REVENUE)
...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Salih Peerzada, Advocate for R-7 Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, Dy.AG
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE.
ORDER
15.12.2025.
WP(C) No. 1616/2024:
Learned counsel for petitioners seeks to withdraw the present petition. His statement is taken on record. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for petitioners, the present petition, along with connected CMs, is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
WP(C) No.1532/2025: Objections stand filed on behalf of private respondent.
Learned counsel for petitioners seeks and is granted two weeks’ time to file rejoinder to the reply filed by private respondent. Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, learned Dy.AG for official respondents, seeks and is granted four weeks, as last and final opportunity, to come up with the reply. List on 09.02.2026. Meanwhile, parties are directed to maintain status quo qua the land in question.
(RAJESH SEKHRI)
JUDGE
Srinagar:
15.12.2025. Misba