IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.6355 of 2025 Date of Decision: 01.05.2025 _______________________________________________________ Dinesh Singh …….Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation & others … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Loveneesh Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, states that the petitioner’s case is squarely covered by the judgment dated 17.07.2014 passed by Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.3050 of 2014, tilted Nek Ram vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others and as such, he would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide his pending representation dated 17.02.2025 (Annexure P-5) in light of aforesaid judgment, in a time bound manner. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate, while putting appearance on behalf of the respondents, fairly states that representation of the petitioner, if not already decided, shall be decided expeditiously. 3. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court without going into the merits of the case deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide representation dated 17.02.2025 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks in light of Nek Ram’s case (supra). Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereupon. Since, it is quite apparent from communication dated 01.02.2025 (Annexure P-4) that petitioner is suffering from high blood sugar and is unable to afford medical treatment due to financial hardship, this Court hopes and trusts that arrears, if any, on account of compliance of instant order in light of Nek Ram’s case (supra) shall be released expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate court of law, if he still remains aggrieved. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge May 01,2025 (shankar)