Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10589 (UTT)

SURENDRA v. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

WPCRL/1968/2021 · 2025-04-02

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1968 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Basant Singh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Mr. Rohit Kumar Gaur, Advocate holding brief of Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for respondent no.3. 4. Learned counsel for the State made a statement at bar that the writ petition has rendered infructuous, as charge sheet has been submitted in the matter on 26.12.2021, which is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioners. 5. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the State, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 6. Accordingly, writ petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said charge sheet, in accordance with law, before appropriate forum. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 02.04.2025 SK