[2025:RJ-JP:24352] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3552/2025 Naresh Jangir @ Rudra Pratap Rosava S/o Sh. Sheeshpal Jangir, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Karanpura, P.S. Taranagar, District Churu (Raj.). At Present Tenant At House No. 103, Village Varsava, P.S. Dean Nagar, District Andheri Mumbai. (At Present In Judicial Custody At Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Majhar Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 03/07/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.1097/2024 registered at Police Station-Kardhani, District-Jaipur (West) for offences under Sections 3, 25(6) of the Arms Act and Sections 111(3), 103(1) & 55 of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that neither any recovery has been made at the instance of the present petitioner nor he was spotted from the place of incident. He further submits that he is involved in this case only on the false and concocted grounds. The prime accused Gajraj Singh @ Gajju [2025:RJ-JP:24352] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3552/2025] from whose concious possession, contraband was recovered, has already been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 25.02.2025 and other co-accused-Mrinal Kapoor, Deepak Kumar, Abhishek Batar and Ravi Vishnoi have also been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He again submits that the petitioner is behind the Bars since 22.10.2024 and charge- sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Naresh Jangir @ Rudra Pratap Rosava S/o Sh. Sheeshpal Jangir shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. 7. Further, the petitioner is directed to mark his presence first week in every month before the SHO, Police Station-Raranagar, District-Churu (Raj.). [2025:RJ-JP:24352] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3552/2025] 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the Court the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to the petitioner by this Court. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/65