AMIT @ CHHOTU S/O RAMESH CHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3512/2025 · 2025-06-04
Mukesh Rajpurohit V J
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10586 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10586 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:22909] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3512/2025 Amit @ Chhotu S/o Ramesh Chand, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Hastganj, Police Station Chauth Ka Barwara, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present District Jail, District Sawai Madhopur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashindra Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.)
Order 04/06/2025
1. The present bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 62/2025 registered at Police Station Choth Ka Barwada, District Sawai Madhopur for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 340(2), 303(2) of BNS and under Section 13 of Rajasthan Public Gambling Ordinance Act, 1949 and under Section 66D of IT Act, 2008.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the complaint against the petitioner is not made by the private person and no amount was recovered from the petitioner. It is further submitted that there is no criminal antecedents against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted
[2025:RJ-JP:22909] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3512/2025] that conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Petitioner is behind the bars since 19.02.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.
4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused-petitioner Amit @ Chhotu S/o Ramesh Chand is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.)),J CHANDAN/Avinash/30