Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 105849 (ALL)

PRADEEP v. State of UP

BAIL/40617/2024 · 2025-04-17

Siddharth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:57662 Reserved On:- 11.04.2025 Delivered On:- 18.04.2025 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40617 of 2024 Applicant :- Pradeep Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vishal Mohan Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Siddharth, J. 1. Heard Sri Vishal Mohan Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Gyan Narain Kanujiya, learned AGA-I for State and perused the material on record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Pradeep, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 106 of 2024, under Sections- 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 IPC and 66-D of I.T. Act, Police Station- Cyber Crime, District- Ghaziabad pending before A.C.J.M., Court No. 15, Ghaziabad. 3. There are allegations in the F.I.R against unknown accused but against the account holders of 15 account numbers and two mobile numbers of commission of online fraud. 4. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is battery rickshaw driver. His account number has been connected to this case during investigation. He has submitted that co-accused, Sumit Kumar, used the current bank account number in his name. Mobile number of Sumit Kumar was added in the bank account. He has been falsely implicated in this case. 5. Learned A.G.A submits that the investigating officer collected evidence which proves that the applicant and co-accused, Sumit Kumar, were having whats-app chats on mobile number of applicant. They conspired to commit the alleged offence. The applicant was clearly involved in this case and it cannot be 2 believed that he would permit co-accused, Sumit Kumar to misuse his current bank account. 6. This Court after hearing the learned counsels for the parties does not finds any ground for enlarging the applicant on bail at this stage. 7. The bail application is accordingly, rejected. 8. The trial court is directed to conclude the trial against the applicant as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 18.04.2025 Rohit Digitally signed by :- ROHIT DAS High Court of Judicature at Allahabad