Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:85033 Court No. - 87 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 36817 of 2024 Applicant :- Marchhoo Ram Opposite Party :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Bajarang Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Amit Kumar Yadav,Bihari Lal Nishad,G.A. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. 1. Heard Sri B.B. Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri A.K. Yadav, learned counsel for opposite party nos.2 & 3 and learned AGA for the State respondents. 2. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking quashing the order dated 09.09.2024 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Chandauli in Maintenance Petition No.616 of 2022 (Marachhoo Ram Gupta v. Raj Kumar Gupta and another), under Section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station Dheena, District Chandauli and further be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the sum of Rs.10,000/- per month for interim maintenance to the applicant. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the applicant happens to be the father of opposite party nos.2 & 3, who had filed a Maintenance Petition No.616 of 2022, under Section 125 Cr.P.C., P.S. Dheena, District Chandauli, however, the Family Court vide order dated 09.09.2024 rejected the same on the ground that the mother of opposite party nos.2 & 3 is still alive but the applicant has performed second marriage and to save himself from paying the maintenance for first wife, he has filed the instant application and the applicant has sufficient property/land in his name. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is an old and ill person, he has executed the second marriage with the permission of his first wife. He further submits that the applicant has executed Will-deed to opposite party nos.2 & 3. 5. Per contra, learned AGA as well as learned counsel for opposite party no.2 submits that the there is no illegality in the impugned order. Further, the applicant has performed second marriage in the presence of his first wife from whom he has two issues, as such there is no question for the family to provide any maintenance to the applicant. To buttress their argument, they have placed reliance on paragraph no.5 of the impugned order dated 09.09.2024, which is quoted hereunder:- "5. वविपकक्षी ककी ओर ससे तकर प्रस्ततुत वकयया गयया हहै वक वितरमयान ययावचिकया वदिनयानांक 17-08-2022 कको प्रस्ततुत ककी गई हहै। वविपकक्षी ककी मयातया वनमरलया दयारया वदिनयानांक 06-06-2022 कको जजिसकसे जिवियाब मम तथया भरण पकोषण ससे बचिनसे कसे जलए ययाचिक्षी कसे दयारया गलत तरक्षीकसे ससे भरण पकोषण ययावचिकया सनांख्यया 616/2022 अपनसे पतुत्र कसे वविरुद्ध प्रस्ततुत वकयया गयया हहै और उक्त ययावचिकया मम तथया वितरमयान ययावचिकया ककी आपजत्ति मम जिको कथन वकयसे गयसे हह विह सरयासर गलत हह। वविपकक्षी ककी ओर ससे उसकसे दयारया प्रस्ततुत उद्धरण खततौनक्षी वि अन्य कयागजियाततों ककी ओर न्ययाययालय कया ध्ययान आकक ष्ट करयातसे हहए तकर प्रस्ततुत वकयया गयया वक ययाचिक्षी कसे पयास पययारप्त भभूवम हहै तथया ययाचिक्षी दयारया वविपकक्षी ककी ममँ एविनां प्रथम पत्नक्षी वनमरलया कसे जिक्षीववित रहतसे हहए दिभूसरया वविवियाह कर जलयया गयया हहै। वविपकक्षी ककी ओर ससे वदिनयानांक 02-09-2024 कको ययाचिक्षी दयारया वदिनयानांक 02-08-2024 कको वनष्पयावदित वविक्रय पत्र ककी छयाययाप्रवत प्रस्ततुत ककी गई हहै।" 6. After hearing learned counsel the parties and perusing the record, I see no illegality and infirmity in the impugned order dated 09.09.2024. 7. The instant application is devoid of merit and is accordingly, dismissed. Order Date :- 20.5.2025 S.P. Digitally signed by :- SANJAY PURI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad