Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 105830 (ALL)

SHIV KUMARI v. State of UP AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/16993/2024 · 2025-02-14

Neeraj Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:21302 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 16993 of 2024 Petitioner :- Shiv Kumari Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Om Prakash Prajapati Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for State- respondents. 2. Pursuant to order of this Court dated 06.02.2025, learned Standing Counsel has produced instruction dated 14.02.2025, which is taken on record. 3. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "i). Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to make payment of insurance amount/compensation amount to petitioner due to death of her husband deployed for treatment of patients of Covid-19 Pandemic. ii) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to consider and decide the application of petitioner in pursuance of letters dated 13.10.2020 and 23.10.2020." 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for redressal of her grievance, petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before respondent No. 2. Lastly, it is submitted in case any representation is filed, direction may be issued to respondent No. 2 to decide the same at the earliest. 5. Learned standing counsel submitted that in case any such representation is filed, the same shall be considered and decided at the earliest. 6. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to move fresh representation along with certified copy of this order before respondent No. 2 within two weeks. In case any such representation is filed, respondent No. 2 is directed to decide the same in accordance with law maximum within a period of two months thereafter. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It is upon respondent No. 2 to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case. Order Date :- 14.2.2025 ADY Digitally signed by :- AMAR DEEP YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad