[2025:RJ-JP:20548] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 3575/2025 Yogesh @ Yogi S/o Ummed Singh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Silarpuri, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At Present In Judicial Custody At District Jail, Jhunjhunu) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sonia Saini & Ms. Nikita Tomar For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 15/05/2025 1. The accused-petitioner has filed this second bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.72/2024 registered with the Police Station Singhana, District Jhunjhunu for offence under Sections 3/25 of Arms Act. 2. The first bail application bearing No.12365/2024 was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 25.11.2024. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 25.03.2024 and the learned Trial Court vide its order dated 12.07.2024 has framed charges against the accused petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel [2025:RJ-JP:20548] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3575/2025] further submits that co-accused namely; Jaiveer s/o Rohitash and Atul S/o Sanjay Choudhary against whom charges for the offences punishable under Section 5/25 of the Arms Act were framed, have already been enlarged on bail by this Court. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer made by counsel for the accused-petitioner. 5. Heard. 6. Considered the submissions made at bar so also perused the material available on record. 7. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 25.03.2024 and charges were framed against him for the offence punishable under Section 3/25 of the Arms Act by the learned Trial Court vide its order dated 12.07.2024. Co-accused persons namely; Jaiveer s/o Rohitash and Atul S/o Sanjay Choudhary against whom charges for the offences punishable under Section 5/25 of the Arms Act were framed, have already been enlarged on bail by this Court. 8. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by this Court and the petitioner is in custody for last more than one year, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 9. This second bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees [2025:RJ-JP:20548] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3575/2025] One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /7