IMTIYAZ AHMAD MIR v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (URBAN DEVELOPMENT) AND ORS
WP(C)/2753/2025 · 2025-11-10
Rajesh Sekhri
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10582 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10582 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 10 Regular Cause list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 2753/2025 CM(7302/2025) Caveat 2767/2025 IMTIYAZ AHMAD MIR …Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. M. Amin Khan, Advocate Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K
...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Sajad Ahmad Mir, Advocate for caveators
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE.
ORDER 10.11.2025
With the appearance of learned counsel for caveators, caveat stands discharged. After brief submissions, learned counsel for petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case respondents are directed to decide the representation dated 31.10.2025, preferred by petitioner within a time frame. Having regard to the limited nature of controversy, present petition is
disposed of, with the direction to respondent No. 1 to accord consideration to the aforesaid representation preferred by petitioner, within a period of four weeks from the date copy of this order is made available to him. The parties shall be given reasonable opportunity of being heard during the process.
Disposed of.
(RAJESH SEKHRI)
JUDGE
Srinagar: 10.11.2025 Misba