Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10582 (JK)

IMTIYAZ AHMAD MIR v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (URBAN DEVELOPMENT) AND ORS

WP(C)/2753/2025 · 2025-11-10

Rajesh Sekhri

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 10 Regular Cause list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 2753/2025 CM(7302/2025) Caveat 2767/2025 IMTIYAZ AHMAD MIR …Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. M. Amin Khan, Advocate Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Sajad Ahmad Mir, Advocate for caveators CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE. ORDER 10.11.2025 With the appearance of learned counsel for caveators, caveat stands discharged. After brief submissions, learned counsel for petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case respondents are directed to decide the representation dated 31.10.2025, preferred by petitioner within a time frame. Having regard to the limited nature of controversy, present petition is disposed of, with the direction to respondent No. 1 to accord consideration to the aforesaid representation preferred by petitioner, within a period of four weeks from the date copy of this order is made available to him. The parties shall be given reasonable opportunity of being heard during the process. Disposed of. (RAJESH SEKHRI) JUDGE Srinagar: 10.11.2025 Misba