Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 105818 (ALL)

REETU v. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER

WRIC/35833/2024 · 2025-03-03

Shekhar B Saraf, Vipin Chandra Dixit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:30843-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35833 of 2024 Petitioner :- Reetu Respondent :- Sub Divisional Officer Counsel for Petitioner :- R.B. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Manu Ghildyal Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. 1. Heard Sri R.B. Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Manu Ghildyal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. In the present writ petition following prayers have been made by the petitioner:- (i). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent to provide the electricity connection to the premise/house of petitioner. (ii). issue any other suitable writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case." 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that there appears to have been a glitch in the online portal, and accordingly, the application of the petitioner could not be processed. 4. In light of the above submissions, the petitioner is directed to once again apply in the online portal and upon such application being made online, the respondents authority is directed to act expeditiously on same, preferably within a period of four weeks from date. If all statutory payments are made by the petitioner a new electricity connection should be granted to the petitioner within the aforesaid period of four weeks. 5. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 4.3.2025 Dev/- (Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad