Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10580 (JHR)

BHAGIRATHI BHUIYAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3331/2025 · 2025-05-01

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:13121 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3331 of 2025 ------ Bhagirathi Bhuiyan, aged about 68 years, son of Late Gena Bhuiyan, Resident of village-Khuri, P.O.-Ranpura, P.S.-Chiniya, Garhwa, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Santosh Kr. Tiwari, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Snehlika Bhagat, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 01-05-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chiniya P.S. Case No.50 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 238 of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed murder of Pradeep Bhuiyan and caused disappearance of the evidence of the murder. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the named accused of the case Vishwanath Bhuiyan. It is next submitted that the petitioner is an old man of 68 years. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-10 of this bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 11.12.2024 as is evident from para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Garhwa in connection with Chiniya P.S. Case No.50 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/