IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Appeal No. 262 of 2015 Date of Decision : 27.08.2025 Parkash Chand ....Petitioner Versus Madan Lal and others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate. For respondents : Mr. Vijay Bhatia, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the appellant submits that present appeal should have been filed before learned Sessions Judge, Hamirpur, District Hamirpur (HP) and not before this Court. Hence, he wants to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to approach the learned Trial Court, before whom the appeal is maintainable. In view of above the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 27th August, 2025 (Anurag) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes