IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 116 Karambir Singh Jaibir CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. of the Constitution of India is for setting aside the 21.05.2019 whereby the Execution Petition bearing No. EXE ‘Karambir and the objections filed by the allowed. 2. to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant revision the petitioner to take recourse to the appropriate remedy, if any, in accordance with law. 3. 4. 23.05.2025 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-65 Date of Decision: Karambir Singh Versus CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Balraj Gujjar, Advocate for the petitioner. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this present revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for setting aside the 21.05.2019 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learned Executing Court whereby the Execution Petition bearing No. EXE vs. Jaibir and others’ was dismissed being not maintainable and the objections filed by the respondent/Judgment After arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant revision the petitioner to take recourse to the appropriate remedy, if any, in accordance with law. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesai .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 65-2025 Date of Decision: 23.05.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Balraj Gujjar, Advocate for the petitioner. Prayer in this present revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for setting aside the impugned order dated 5) passed by the learned Executing Court whereby the Execution Petition bearing No. EXE-237-2017 titled as ’ was dismissed being not maintainable respondent/Judgment-Debtors were After arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant revision petition, with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the appropriate remedy, if any, in with the liberty aforesaid. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No Prayer in this present revision petition filed under Article 227 impugned order dated 5) passed by the learned Executing Court 2017 titled as ’ was dismissed being not maintainable Debtors were After arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he ty to the petitioner to take recourse to the appropriate remedy, if any, in RISHU KATARIA 2025.05.26 10:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.