ANIL SINGH ALIAS ANIL KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.M.P./890/2025 · 2025-04-25
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10575 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10575 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:12439] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No.890 of 2025
------ Anil Singh @ Anil Kumar Singh, aged about 65 years, son of Bireshwar Singh, resident of Village- Tangertoli, P.O.- Lasia, P.S.- Kolebira, District- Simdega
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Prabhu Dayal Agrawal, Spl.P.P.
------
Order No:-03 Dated:-25-04-2025
Heard the parties.
This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer for restoration of A.B.A. No.1451 of 2025 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 04.03.2025 passed by this Court.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that A.B.A. No.1451 of 2025 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 04.03.2025 passed by this Court to file a supplementary affidavit annexing therewith the certified copy of F.I.R. and other relevant documents to show as to who are the accused persons of Kolebira P.S. Case No.38 of 2024, Kolebira P.S. Case No.36 of 2021 and Kolebira P.S. Case No.32 of 2024. It is next submitted that after passing of the said order dated 04.03.2025 passed in A.B.A. No.1451 of 2025, the counsel for the petitioner tried to get the certified copy of the same and it took some time due to which the petitioner could not file the said documents within the stipulated time; which resulted in dismissal of the said A.B.A. No.1451 of 2025. It is next submitted that non-compliance of the said order dated 04.03.2025 within the stipulated time was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said A.B.A. No.1451 of 2025 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the A.B.A. No.1451 of 2025 be restored to its original file.
Learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection.
Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, A.B.A. No.1451 of 2025 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal.
Registry is directed to list A.B.A. No.1451 of 2025 before the concerned Bench after a week.
This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/