ABDUL QAYOOM SHAN v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY GEOLOGY AND MINING, JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/3002/2025 · 2026-06-30
Sanjay Parihar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1057 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1057 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP(C) No. 3002/2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 3002/2025
Date of pronouncement : 30.06.2026
Uploaded on : 01.07.2026
Abdul Qayoom Shan
….Petitioners
Through:- Ms. Shamima Jan, Advocate
V/s
UT of J&K & Ors.
…..Respondents
Through:- Mr. Deewakar Sharma, Dy. AG
\
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 30.06.2026
-
1. Mr. Deewakar Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, submits that, in terms of the order dated 31.10.2025, respondent No. 2 was
directed to consider the representations dated 28.04.2025 and 16.05.2025 submitted by the petitioner. However, no action has been taken thereon so far.
2. Mr. Deewakar Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, further submits that if the present writ petition is treated as a representation and the respondents are directed to consider the same, he has no objection.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly agreed to the said course of action. Serial No. 54 Regular List
WP(C) No. 3002/2025
4. In view of the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that it shall be treated as a representation before respondent No. 2, who shall consider and decide the same within a period of two months.
5. The petitioner shall furnish a copy of the writ petition along with all annexed documents in the office of respondent No. 2 within a period of 15 days, thereby enabling respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the representation within two months thereafter.
6. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
7. Interim direction(s), if any, shall stand vacated.
(SANJAY PARIHAR) JUDGE JAMMU
30.06.2026
Sneha
Whether the judgment is speaking: Yes Whether the judgment is reportable: No