Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1057 (JK)

ABDUL QAYOOM SHAN v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY GEOLOGY AND MINING, JAMMU AND OTHERS

WP(C)/3002/2025 · 2026-06-30

Sanjay Parihar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP(C) No. 3002/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 3002/2025 Date of pronouncement : 30.06.2026 Uploaded on : 01.07.2026 Abdul Qayoom Shan ….Petitioners Through:- Ms. Shamima Jan, Advocate V/s UT of J&K & Ors. …..Respondents Through:- Mr. Deewakar Sharma, Dy. AG \ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER 30.06.2026 - 1. Mr. Deewakar Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, submits that, in terms of the order dated 31.10.2025, respondent No. 2 was directed to consider the representations dated 28.04.2025 and 16.05.2025 submitted by the petitioner. However, no action has been taken thereon so far. 2. Mr. Deewakar Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, further submits that if the present writ petition is treated as a representation and the respondents are directed to consider the same, he has no objection. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly agreed to the said course of action. Serial No. 54 Regular List WP(C) No. 3002/2025 4. In view of the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that it shall be treated as a representation before respondent No. 2, who shall consider and decide the same within a period of two months. 5. The petitioner shall furnish a copy of the writ petition along with all annexed documents in the office of respondent No. 2 within a period of 15 days, thereby enabling respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the representation within two months thereafter. 6. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Interim direction(s), if any, shall stand vacated. (SANJAY PARIHAR) JUDGE JAMMU 30.06.2026 Sneha Whether the judgment is speaking: Yes Whether the judgment is reportable: No