Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10567 (AP)

M K SARADHI CHAKRAVARTHI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/7251/2020 · 2025-09-10

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010120482020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7251/2020 Between: 1. M K SARADHI CHAKRAVARTHI, S/O M.KANNAN, AGED 47 YRS, D.NO. 1-5-599/M, 301, THIRD FLOOR, MEGANA RESIDENCY, BALAJI COLONY, TIRUPATHI, A.P 2. SMT. M.NIRMALA,, W/O M.K.SARADHI CHAKRAVARTHI, AGED 46 YRS, D.NO. 1-5-599/M, 301, THIRD FLOOR, MEGANA RESIDENCY, BALAJI COLONY, TIRUPATHI, A.P ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, URBAN OFFICE, PRAKASAM ROAD, NEAR TOWNCLUB, TIRUPATHI 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATHI CRIME POLICE STATION, 137, ALIPIRI ROAD, TIRUPATI, ANDHRA PRADESH 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, TIRUPATHI CRIME POLICE STATION, 137, ALIPIRI ROAD, TIRUPATI, ANDHRA PRADESH 5. R RAJA SEKHAR, VILLA NO. 36, VADDEPALLI ENCLAVE, NEAR CHITHARAMMA TEMPLE, VIVEKANANDA NAGAR, JAGADEER 2 GUTTA ROAD, KUKATPALLI, HYDERABAD ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. T M K CHAITANYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7251 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue appropriate writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impugned actions of the respondents no. 3 and 4 in calling the petitioners at the instance of 5th respondent day-in and day-out to the 3rd respondent police station as highly Illegal, Arbitrary and Violative of Article 19 and 21 of the constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to harass the petitioners nor implicate them in false cases, except under due process of law and to pass….” 2. Heard Sri T.M.K Chaitanya, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the police are calling the petitioners to the police station, without there being any crime registered against them. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not calling the petitioners to the police station, since no crime has been registered against them. 5. Considering the submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. However, the police are directed not to call the petitioners to the police station in absence of any crime registered against the petitioners. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 11.09.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.7251 of 2020 Dated.11.09.2025 UPS 185