ALI MOHAMMAD MIR AND OTHERS v. DEPUTY COMMISSONER BUDGAM PCB, HOME
OWP/948/2017 · 2025-12-03
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10566 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10566 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 04 REGULAR CAUSE LIST
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR OWP 948/2017 CM(3323/2025) Ali Mohammad Mir & Others. …Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs. Deputy Commissioner Budgam & Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Hakim Aman Ali, Dy. AG for R-1 to 5.
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.
ORDER 03.12.2025
01. The record reveals that by virtue of an order dated 8th October, 2025, this Court granted time to the learned counsel for the petitioners to file an affidavit to show as to how much land is owned and possessed by the petitioners in village Sanzipora, Chadoora, Budgam, Kashmir. It was also made clear by virtue of the aforesaid order that failure to submit the requisite affidavit would result in dismissal of the writ petition for want of essential facts.
02. As the affidavit was not filed, this Court by virtue of
order dated 12th November, 2025 granted further time to the
learned counsel for the petitioners to file the requisite affidavit.
03. Today, when the instant case was taken up, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and even the
order passed by this Court on 8th October, followed by order
dated 12th November, 2025, have not been complied with. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioners are no more interested in pursuing the instant writ petition.
04. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
SRINAGAR: 03.12.2025
“HAMID”