Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:14595 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35885 of 2024 Petitioner :- Mohan And Another Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satya Narayan Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Deepak Gaur Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel and Sri Deepak Gaur, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha. Petitioners have approached this Court challenging the impugned orders dated 31.10.2018 and 30.06.2022 passed by respondent nos.3 and 2 respectively and a direction in the nature of mandamus to the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from the plot in question.
Learned counsel for respondents/State has raised a preliminary objection that petition is highly belated as there is a delay of more than two years. The impugned order is of 30.06.2022, however the present writ petition is filed in October, 2024.
Learned counsel for petitioners has filed a supplementary affidavit in which in Paragraph No.2, it is stated that the petitioners had provided all the documents and some money to a local counsel for filing the writ petition but said papers were lost and he again arranged the said documents and filed the present petition. This Court is not satisfied with the explanation given for delay in filing the present petition. In view thereof, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of delay. (Vivek Chaudhary, J.)
Order Date :- 31.1.2025 Arjun/- Digitally signed by :- ARJUN PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad