GURNAM SINGH AND ANOTHER v. CANARA BANK, TH IT SAUTHORIZED OFFICER, AND ANOTHER
WP(C)/2538/2025 · 2026-07-01
Rajesh Sekhri, Sindhu Sharma
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1056 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1056 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 32 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2538/2025 CM No. 5845/2025
Gurnam Singh & anr. …. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- None
V/s
Canara Bank and anr. …..Respondent(s)
Through:- None
CORAM :
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER 01.07.2026
There was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on
23.12.2025.
Vide order dated 15.09.2025, it was directed that subject to 50% of the amount due as on date with the Bank within a period of four weeks, there shall be no coercive action against the petitioner by the Bank.
Petitioner has failed to comply the order dated 15.09.2025 and today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners have lost interest in pursuing the present petition.
Accordingly, this petition alongwith connected application(s) is dismissed in default of appearance and for non-prosecution.
(RAJESH SEKHRI) (SINDHU SHARMA)
Judge
Judge JAMMU RAM MURTI/PS 01.07.2026 Ram Murti 2026.07.01 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document