APHC010120382019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 5303/2019 Between: 1. K. RANJIT KUMAR, S/O K. SUBBA RAO, 32 YEARS, AGRICULTURE, R/O PUTRELA, VISSANNAPET MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NUZVID RANGE, NUZVID DIVISION, NUZVID MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TIRUVUUR PS TIRUVUUR MANDAL, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. MORAMPUDI RAVI BABU, R/O TELLADEVARAPALLI MANDAL, VIJAYWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. RADHA KRISHNA, PROPRIETOR, M/S GANESH AUTO FINANCE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S V INDIRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.5303 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ, order or directions, more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not taking action according to law against the party respondents invoking the provisions of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe [Prevention of Atrocities] Act 1989, in pursuance of the petitioner's complaint Dated 15.02.2019 as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory, malafide, unconstitutional violating Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and issue consequential directions, directing the Respondents No.1 and 2 to conduct enquiry and investigation by an officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police, and take action as per law including registering FIR against party respondents invoking the provisions of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe [Prevention of Atrocities Act] 1989, in pursuance of petitioner’s complaint Dated 15.02.2019, in protecting the fundamental rights and dignity of the petitioner, and to pass…” 2. Smt.S.V.Indira, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in spite of several calls to the petitioner, for instructions, he is not coming forward to prosecute the case and hence, necessary orders may be rendered in the writ petition. 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 31.07.2025 Pmk 4 11 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:5303 OF 2019 Date: 31.07.2025 Pmk