HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 36652 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Heard Sri Akhilesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Sampoorna Nand, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Jai Prakash Singh Yadav, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and Sri B.P. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State respondents. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred for quashing the entire proceeding of S.T. No. 275 of 2016 arising out of Case Crime No. 16 of 2008 under sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 504, 506, 440, 447 IPC, P.S. Harpur Budhat, District Gorakhpur pending before the court of Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (E.C. Act), Gorakhpur. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants and opposite party nos. 2 and 3 have entered into compromise and the same has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same is on record. It is further submitted that the first informant Arjun Pandey and the injured Ram Bhulan have already died. It is further submitted that none of the injury received by the injured persons are dangerous to life. It is also submitted that in view of the compromise arrived at between the applicants and opposite party nos. 2 and 3, proceedings of the aforesaid case be quashed against the applicants. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant. 5. In view of the fact that the applicants and opposite party nos. 2 and 3 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on record and keeping in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Naushey Ali & Others Vs. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sampoorna Nand Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Jay Prakash Singh Yadav, Pravesh Kumar Singh Rambhulan Chaurasiya And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) State of U.P. & Another, 2025 INSC 182 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed in respect of the applicant. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of S.T. No. 275 of 2016 arising out of Case Crime No. 16 of 2008 under sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 504, 506, 440, 447 IPC, P.S. Harpur Budhat, District Gorakhpur pending before the court of Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (E.C. Act), Gorakhpur are hereby quashed. 7. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands allowed. September 19, 2025 Madhurima A482 No. 36652 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- MADHURIMA GARG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad