SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1966 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. A.M. Saklani, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that after filing of the charge sheet, pursuant to the impugned F.I.R., the same was challenged under C482 application, before this Court, which too was allowed/disposed-off, in view of the compounding application made by the parties. 4. Thus, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 5. In view of the aforesaid facts, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 02.04.2025 SK