APHC010120702020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 7443/2020 Between: 1. REDDY MARKEN, S/O VENKATA RAO, AGED 53 YEARS, R/O K.ILENDUPRAM, IRAGAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY IT IS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, THULLUR MANDALAM, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU. 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KOVVURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. TASHILDAR, TANUKU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ or order or direction with more particularlyin the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondent authorities in issuing notification dated 13.01.2020 under Act 30 of 2013 to acquire the lands of the petitioner as illegal, unconstitutional and consequently set aside the Notification No.ROC.No.e-1776979/2020/C4 2 Dated 13.01.2020 published in newspapers on 17.01.2020 by making tic lea rtha the lands of the petitioner cannot be acquired and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to restrain the respondents from for proceedings further including conducting of hearing passing of final orders etc. by the Respondent No.2 and 3 in pursuance to Notification No.ROC.No.e- 1776979/2020/C4 Dated 13-01-2020 after suspending the same and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K S MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in issuing notification dated 13.01.2020 under Act 30 of 2013 to acquire the lands of the petitioner. 3. The 3rd respondent filed counter affidavit stating that alternative lands were selected in Komaravaram village in preference to the lands proposed earlier relating to the petitioner to an extent of Ac.4.47 cents in R.S.No.100-7 and 99-2 of Komaravaram Village. He further averred in the counter that the respondents have withdrawn from the acquisition of the lands of the petitioner. 4. In view of the same, nothing survives in this writ petition and the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 05.08.2025 NNN