[2025:RJ-JP:13354] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3599/2025 Netram S/o Shri Hanuman Sahay, Aged About 40 Years, R/o- Agar, Police Station Pratapgarh, District Alwar. (At Present Confined At Central Jail Ghatgate Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vaibhav Pancholi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 25/03/2025 1. This instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.208/2024, registered at Police Station Raisar, District Jaipur Rural for the offence punishable under Section 310(2) of BNS, 2023. Later on, Police has filed charge- sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Section 310(2) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3/25 of Arms Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submit that no specific role has been attributed to the petitioner. He further submits that it appears from the FIR that an exaggerated version has been narrated by the complainant. He argues that other co-accused persons namely Paramveer Singh @ Golu, Krishna & Guddu @ Ramkaran have already been granted [2025:RJ-JP:13354] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3599/2025] benefit of bail by this Court as well as co-accused Sunil has been granted benefit of bail by learned trial Court. He further argues that charge-sheet has already been filed and trial of the case will take considerable time. He contends that the petitioner is in custody since 04.10.2024 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. He submits that petitioner is habitual offender as six other cases have been registered against him. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that no specific role has been attributed to the petitioner; material available on record in the form of charge-sheet; co-accused persons have already been granted benefit of bail by this Court as well as learned trial Court; looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Netram S/o Shri Hanuman Sahay shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any [2025:RJ-JP:13354] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3599/2025] Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 10. The observation made herein above is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /57