COCP-240-2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. COCP-240-2011 Reserved on: 27.02.2025 Pronounced on: 01.04.2025 RAJ KUMAR SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRs. .....Petitioner Versus ASHWANI SHARMA, LAC, PANCHKULA AND ORS. ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Argued by: Mr. Jayender Singh Chandail, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. P.P.Chahar, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Karan Jindal, Asstt. A.G., Haryana. Mr. P.S.Chauhan, Advocate Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate and Mr. Siddharth Arora, Advocate for respondent – HSVP. **** SURESHWAR THAKUR , J. 1. Since this Court through an order passed on 02.05.2024, has decided LPA-581-2022 (partly) and other connected petitions, and, has made certain directions in paragraph No. 26, to the concerned, therefore, the present contempt petition is also disposed of, in terms of the said orders. 2. Even otherwise, a perusal of the records besides perusal of the order impugned before this Court reveals that no actionable contemptuous act, is made out against the contemners/respondents concerned, therefore, the instant contempt petition is dismissed being KAVNEET SINGH 2025.04.05 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-240-2011 -2- devoid of any merit. 3. Since the main case itself has been decided, thus, all pending applications, if any, are disposed of as such. (SURESHWAR THAKUR) JUDGE (VIKAS SURI) 01.04.2025 JUDGE kavneet singh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No KAVNEET SINGH 2025.04.05 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document