KARTHIK v. STATE REPBY ITS, THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE ,
CRL OP/1624/2025 · 2025-02-03
Sunder Mohan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10552 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10552 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.OP.No.1624 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.02.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl.OP.No.1624 of 2025 V.Karthik ... Petitioner /Accused Vs. State rep. by its, The Sub-Inspector of Police, Dhavantri (D Nagar) Police Station, Pondicherry. ... Respondent/ Complainant (Cr.No.253 of 2024) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of their arrest at the hands of the respondent pending investigation in Cr.No.253 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police. For petitioner : Mr.Ezhil Balaji For Respondent : Mr.S.Balaji, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Page No.1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.1624 of 2025 police for the offences punishable under Sections 118(1), 3(5), 351(3) of BNS, 2023 and thereafter altered to 296(b), 118(1), 109(1) and 351(3) r/w 3(5) of BNS, 2023, in Crime No.253 of 2024, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. It is the case of the prosecution that, due to previous enmity, the petitioner, along with other accused went to the defacto complainant's house and picked up quarrel. During quarrel, the accused abused the defacto complainant using filthy language and assaulted him with knife. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that even as per the prosecution, the injured has been discharged from the hospital. Therefore, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the Page No.2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.1624 of 2025 respondent police, on instructions submitted that the petitioner/ accused is a history sheeter and that there are four previous cases pending against the petitioner. He would further submit that injured has been discharged from the hospital. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the nature of allegations and that the petitioner is as a history sheeter and having four previous cases of similar nature, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7.
Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. 03.02.2025 Page No.3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.1624 of 2025 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No skr Page No.4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.1624 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN, J. skr To
1. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Dhavantri (D Nagar) Police Station, Pondicherry. 2. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. Crl.OP.No.1624 of 2025 03.02.2025 Page No.5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis