1 2025:CGHC:6115 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 478 of 2018 1 - Smt. Randeep Kour Gujral W/o Mahendrapal Gujral Aged About 50 Years R/o Civil Line Darogapara, Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 2 - Mahendrapal Gujral S/o Late Balwant Singh Gujral Aged About 54 Years R/o Civil Line Darogapara, Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Shivshankar Awasthi S/o Late Devi Prasad Awasthi Aged About 66 Years R/o Baikunthpur, Tahsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh At Present Near Rani Talab Mandir Rewa Tahsil Hujur, And District Rewa M. P. 2 - Shrawan Kumar Mishra S/o Ramakant Mishra Aged About 29 Years R/o Khaparganj Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - Abhay Kumar Mishra (Joint Collector), Nazul Office, Raigarh Chhattisgarhat Presently Posted At Deputy Secretary, State Of Chhattisgarh Mahanadi Bhawan Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - S. L. Ratre Upper Collector, Raigarh At Present Osted At Upper Collector Durg Chhattisgarh AKHILESH KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by AKHILESH KUMAR DEWANGAN 2 5 - G. N. S. Paikara Assistant Superintendent, Land Record, At Present Posted At Land Record, Collector Superintendent, Land Record, Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 6 - E. Kullu, Revenue Inspector (Nazul), Raigarh At Present Posted At Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 7 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station City Kotwali, Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Syed Mohammad Sohail Afzal holding the brief of Ms. Hamida Siddiqui, Advocate. For Respondent No.4 : Mr. A.S. Rajput, Advocate Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 03/02/2025 1. Heard Mr. Syed Mohammad Sohail Afzal, learned counsel holding the brief of Ms. Hamida Siddiqui for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. A.S. Rajput, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following relief: “It is therefore, prayed that the Hon’ble Court kindly be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 08.01.2016 (Annexure P-1) and the petitioners may kindly be discharged from the offence under Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 472 of Indian Penal Code, in the interest of justice.” 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous as the trial has already been concluded. 4. Learned counsel for respondent No.4 has no objection. 5. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Akhil