Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10548 (KAR)

CHAGANLAL PRAJAPAT v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/200660/2025 · 2025-06-19

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3218 CRL.P No. 200660 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 200660 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. CHAGANLAL PRAJAPAT S/O CHOGARAMJI PRAJAPAT, AGE:53 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO.4-13-71, NEAR GACCHI BOWALI, BADIGER ONI, YADGIR CITY–585201. 2. MEGHANATH S/O YANKAPPA, AGE:57 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS, R/O. 2-13-10/1 NEAR MAILAPUR BASE, KOLIWADA, YADGIR –585201. 3. NAGRAJ S/O KRISHNA GOUDA, AGE:58 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO.5-1-229/1/E, NEAR LAXMI TEMPLE, LAXMI NAGAR, YADGIR (RURAL)–585201. 4. DEVANANDA DASANKER S/O DAVID DASANKER, AGE:56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS, R/O. YADGIR-585201. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHIVASHARANA REDDY, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by RENUKA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3218 CRL.P No. 200660 of 2025 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH YADGIR TOWN POLICE STATION, TQ AND DIST. YADGIR – 585201, REPT BY ADDL. SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH–585103. 2. PARASHURAM SHEGURKAR S/O AMBANNA SHEGURKAR, AGE:41 YEARS, OCC: SOCIAL WORKER, R/O. MAILAPUR AGASI, BANDIGERA, TQ. AND DIST.YADGIR - 585201 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. ARATI PATIL ,HCGP FOR R1; SRI RAVI B. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 528 OF BNSS,2023 PRAYING TO, a) QUASH THE ENTIRE FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CRIME NO.26/2025 OF RESPONDENT YADGIR TOWN P.S AND FURTHER PROCEEDINGS ARISING THERE FROM PURSUANT TO REGISTRATION OF FIR AND COMPLAINT AGAINST PETITIONERS BEFORE RESPONDENT YADGIR TOWN POLICE STATION FOR OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/SEC 420, 504, 506 OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC (SR.DN) COURT YADGIR. b) PASS ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE ORDER OR DIRECTION AS DEEMED FIT BY THIS HON’BLE COURT UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3218 CRL.P No. 200660 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA) After addressing the arguments for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo. The said memo reads as under: “Memo for withdrawal of petition with a liberty to file on Charge-Sheet materials That the top noted petition was filed on FIR and Complaint by seeking relief of quashing the FIR and complaint against the petitioners, that since charge-sheet is about to be filed after the investigation, that in view of same the petitioners be permitted to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file the fresh petition on charge-sheet materials, hence, with such liberty petitioners be permitted to withdraw the petition in the interest of justice.” The said memo is placed on record. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SVH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37