Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 105457 (ALL)

SHESH NATH AND 5 OTHERS v. State of UP AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/35334/2024 · 2025-03-18

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:39800 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35334 of 2024 Petitioner :- Shesh Nath And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Uma Nath Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "I. a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 to decide the stay application filed in Revision No. 218/A, Computerized No.C202315000001723 (Shesh Nath and others Versus State of U.P. and another), under Section 333 of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act within time bound period which may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court and further pass an interim order to maintain status quo by both the parties, during the pendency of the stay application in respect of land in question" 3. The petitioners have filed a revision before the Commissioner, Azamgarh along with a stay application. The revision filed by them has been admitted but no order has been passed on the stay application filed by the petitioners. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and a direction be issued to respondent No. 2- Commissioner, Azamgarh Mandal, Azamgarh to decide the stay application filed by the petitioners within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court. 5. In view of the same, respondent No. 2-Commissioner, Azamgarh Mandal, Azamgarh is directed to consider and decide the stay application filed by the petitioners in the revision, expeditiously, preferably, within a period of four weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. It is further directed that revision itself be considered and decided by respondent No. 2 within a period of three months thereafter. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 19.3.2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad