JASHANPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/11322/2024 · 2025-07-30
Jasjit Singh Bedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 105437 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 105437 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-11322-2024 (O & M) ::1::
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (237) CRWP-11322-2024 (O & M)
Date of decision: 30.07.2025 Jashanpreet Kaur and anr. …... Petitioner(s) V/s State of Punjab and ors. ...Respondent(s) CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Amit Kashyap, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, AAG, Punjab. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI,
J. (Oral)
The prayer in the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus to direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to provide police protection to the petitioners and to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the respondents No.4 to 9 and further issue directions to the respondents No. 4 to 9 not to interfere in the married life of the petitioners in any manner.
2. The learned State counsel has placed on record a short reply dated 06.01.2025. While referring to Para 4 of the said reply, he submits that the statements of the private respondents were recorded and they have SUKHPREET KAUR 2025.07.30 07:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh
CRWP-11322-2024 (O & M) ::2:: categorically stated that they have no objection to the marriage of the petitioners.
3. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed.
4. The present petition stands disposed of. July 30, 2025
( JASJIT SINGH BEDI) sukhpreet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUKHPREET KAUR 2025.07.30 07:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh