Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10543 (KAR)

SANJEEV KUMAR v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ORS

MFA/204348/2023 · 2025-06-10

Ravi V Hosmani

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2960 MFA No. 204348 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO.204348 OF 2023 (LAC) BETWEEN: SANJEEV KUMAR S/O KALYANRAO BIRADAR, AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: JAMAGA (R) VILLAGE, TALUK: ALAND, DIST: KALABURAGI - 585 314. …APPELLANT (BY SRI SHIVALING.N. PADSHETTY, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, STATION ROAD, KALABURAGI - 585 102. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, M.I. AND UWD (NORTH) ZONE, VIJAYAPURA - 586 109. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, M.I. AND UWD DIVISION, KALABURAGI – 585 102. 4. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KNNL, BNT KALABURAGI - 585 102. …RESPONDENTS THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 74(1) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION REHABILITATION, RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL WITH COSTS AND MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 30.11.2021 PASSED IN L.A.C.NO.103/2019 AND THE ORDER DATED 03.03.2023 PASSED IN REVIEW PETITION NO.04/2022 BY I-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KALABURAGI FIX THE MARKET VALUE FOR LAND ACQUIRED AT THE RATE OF RS.8,82,412/- PER ACRE AND AWARD ALL STATUTORY BENEFITS. Digitally signed by RAMESH MATHAPATI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:2960 MFA No. 204348 of 2023 THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIST APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT When matter was listed for non-compliance of office objections for sixth time, this Court on 08.04.2025, granted four weeks’ time as finally for compliance of office objections and in case of non-compliance, ordered matter to be listed for dismissal. Till date, office objections are not complied. There is no representation. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE NB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16 Ct;Vk