Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 105421 (ALL)

ANIL KUMAR PAL v. State of U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

A482/36579/2024 · 2025-03-23

Vikas Budhwar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:42838 Court No. - 73 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 36579 of 2024 Applicant :- Anil Kumar Pal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Pal,Vikram Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J. 1. Heard Sri Vikram Bahadur Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri B.S. Kushwaha, learned AGA for the State. 2. In view of the order which is being proposed to be passed, notices are not being issued to the opposite parties No. 2 & 3. 3. The sole prayer made in the present application is to direct the court below to take appropriate decision in the proceedings in Complaint Case No. 571 of 2022 (Anil Kumar Pal Vs. Rajat Maurya @ Shubham Maurya), under Section 138 NI Act, 1881, P.S. Colonelganj, District Prayagraj. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that despite the fact that the proceedings are pending but the same has not given a logical end. 5. Learned AGA has no objection to the same. 6. Considering the submission raised at bar, the application stands disposed of requiring the learned Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Allahabad to take appropriate decision in the pending proceedings strictly in accordance with law within a period of six months without granting unnecessary adjournments and, in case, any adjournment is granted then the same should be in exceptional circumstances in this regard, subject to legal impediment, if any. Order Date :- 24.3.2025 Rajesh Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad