Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 105419 (ALL)

MOHD IMRAN KHAN AND ANOTHER v. State of U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLR/5517/2024 · 2025-07-14

Manjive Shukla

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:114176 Court No. - 86 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5517 of 2024 Revisionist :- Mohd Imran Khan And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Asar Mukhtar,Ikram Ahmad,Mohd Shamim Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Salman Ahmad,Saqib Meezan Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Mohd Shamim Khan, learned counsel appearing for the revisionists, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State and Sri Saqib Meezan, learned counsel appearing for Opposite Party No.2. 3. The instant revision has been filed challenging therein, the judgment and order dated 29.11.2022 passed by the learned Additional Court, Court No.2, Ghaziabad in Complaint No.1255 of 2022 (Mohd. Rizwan Vs. Nawab Mohd. Imran Khan and another) under Section 138 N.I. Act, whereby, the revisionists had been convicted and had been sentenced for simple imprisonment of one month each along with fine of Rs.26,00,000/-. 4. The revisionists through this criminal revision have also challenged the judgment and order dated 7.10.2024 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Ghaziabad in Criminal Appeal No.04 of 2023 (Mohd. Imran and another Vs. State of U.P. and another) whereby, the appeal filed by the revisionists had been dismissed and the order of conviction and sentence dated 29.11.2022 had been affirmed. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the revisionists, at the very outset, submits that after filing of this revision, the revisionists and Opposite Party No.2 have entered into a compromise and have settled their disputes amicably and the revisionists had paid the entire outstanding amount to Opposite Party No.2 as directed by the learned trial court. 6. Sri Meezan Saqib, learned counsel appearing for Opposite Party No.2 admits that the parties have entered into a compromise and now there is no dispute amongst them. He also does not have any objection if this criminal revision is allowed and the orders impugned in this criminal revision are set aside. 7. I have considered the submissions advanced by the learned counsels appearing for the parties. 8. I find that the parties have settled their dispute through compromise. 9. In view of the aforesaid submissions, this criminal revision is allowed. The judgment and order dated 29.11.2022 passed by the learned Additional Court, Court No.2, Ghaziabad in Complaint No.1255 of 2022 (Mohd. Rizwan Vs. Nawab Mohd. Imran Khan and another) and the order dated 7.10.2024 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Ghaziabad in Criminal Appeal No.04 of 2023 (Mohd. Imran and another Vs. State of U.P. and another), are hereby set aside. 10. The amount, if any, deposited before the trial court, if not paid to Opposite Party No.2 till date, shall be released in his favour forthwith. Order Date :- 15.7.2025 Salim Digitally signed by :- SALIM PRAVEJ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad