1 APHC010119892020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7392/2020 Between: 1. GRANDHI SHIVA PHANINDRA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA MURTHY,, SON RAM MOHANA RAO AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS HINDU RIO FLAT NO.312 M.K SIGNATURE NEAR BOLINEN HOSPITALS BYEPASS ROAD, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. GRANDHI KAMALA, W/O G.S.P.V.S.N.MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, HINDU, HOUSE-WIFE, R/O FLAT NO.312, M.K. SIGNATURE, NEAR BOLLINENI HOSPITALS, BYEPASS ROAD, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ( HOME), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE URBAN, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE URBAN, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM CITY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. PASUPULETI RAMA KRISHNA SIO NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, INSPECTOR OF POLICE, R/O D.NO.15-57/11, PRATAP APARTMENTS, 5TH FLOOR, PADMAVATHI NAGAR, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.(PRESENTLY WORKING IN GOVERNMENT RAILWAY POLICE, TIRUPATHI). 2 8. PASUPULETI VENKATA RAMANA SIO NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, INSPECTOR OF POLICE, II- TOWN POLICE STATION, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 9. RAJEEV REDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, HINDU, BUSINESS, RIO NANDI TIFFINS, NANDI JUNCTION, OPPOSITE KAPILATEETHAM, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 10. PENUMALLA MOULI CHANDRA SIO ANNAVARAM, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, RIO MAIN ROAD, KOTHAPETA, KOTHAPETA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CHANDRA SEKHAR ILAPAKURTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the Police Stations under the supervision of Respondents 2 to 6 herein in trying to implicate the Petitioners 1 and 2 herein in Criminal Cases at the instance of the Respondents 7 to 10 herein during the pendency of Insolvency Petition I.P.No.1 of 2020 pending on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge Court at Rajamahendravaram East Godavari District as arbitrary autocratic ultravires and against to the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents 1 to 6 herein not to register false criminal cases against the Petitioners 1 and 2 herein without due process of law in the interests of justice and pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court deems fit and proper under the circumstances of the case” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 05.08.2025 Asr 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.7392 of 2020 Dt.05.08.2025 Asr