Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:69703 Court No. - 84 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 35919 of 2024 Applicant :- Nasir Alias Lalla Alias Imran Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilendra Yadav,Sudhir Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
1. Supplementary affidavit, filed today, is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to allow this application and direct the learned court below to consider the acceptance of one bond and sureties in one case which shall be good for all the ten cases, Crime No. 149 of 2014 U/s 395, 397 I.P.C. Police Station Ramgarh, District Firozabad, Crime No. 443 of 2016 U/s 457, 380 I.P.C. Police Station Rangarh, District Firozabad, Crime No. 849 of 2016 U/s 399, 402, 147, 148, 149, 307 1.P.C. Police Station Ramgarh, District Firozabad, Crime No. 203 of 2016 U/s 399, 402, 147 I.P.C. Police Station Ramgarh, District Firozabad, Crime No. 223 of 2016 U/s 386, 452 I.P.C. Police Station Ramgarh, District Firozabad, Crime No. 238 of 2016 U/s 386 I.P.C. Police Station Ramgarh, District Firozabad, Crime No. 873 of 2017 U/s 8/20 NDPS Act Police Station Ramgarh, District Firozabad, Crime No. 4 of 2020 U/s 457, 380 I.P.C. Police Station Ramgarh, District Firozabad, Crime No. 96 of 2020 U/s 307 I.P.C. Police Station Ramgarh, District Firozabad, Case Crime No. 792 of 2019 U/s 147, 148, 149, 307, 332, 353, 395, 397, 283, 342, 427, 336, 337, 188, 323, 325, 436 I.P.C., U/s 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, & Section 3/4 Prevention of Public Property Damages Act Police Station Rasoolpur, District Firozabad. 4. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that applicant has been granted bail in all the aforesaid ten cases with direction that he shall deposit personal bond and two sureties in all the bail orders. He next submits that applicant is not in a position to furnish huge amount in all the cases, in which he has been granted bail. He has placed reliance over the judgment of Hon'ble The Apex Court passed in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. The State of UP, in Special
Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.8915 of 2018 passed on 29.10.2018.
The operative portion of the order of Hon'ble the Apex Court is quoted herein below:
"However, by the impugned order, the High Court has modified the conditions of bail imposed by the Trial Court in the instant cases by directing the Trial Court to accept one common surety for all the cases and one surety each for the 31 cases.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even though the Court has granted bail to the petitioner, the petitioner is unable to execute the bail bonds because of the onerous conditions of bail imposed particularly the condition of producing 31 sureties. Considering the submissions, the impugned order is modified to the extent that the petitioner shall execute a personal bond for Rs. 30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand only) and the same bond shall hold good for all 31 cases. There shall be two sureties who shall execute the bond for Rs. 30,000/- which bond shall hold good for all the 31 cases. It is clarified that the personal bond so executed by the Petitioner and the bond so executed by the two sureties shall hold good for all the 31 cases. With these observations, the Special Leave Petitions are disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of."
5. In view of the judgment passed by Hon'ble the Apex Court, the trial court is directed to accept one common surety for all the ten cases.
6. In view of the above, the impugned order is modified to the extent that the applicant shall execute a personal bond for Rs.1,00,000/- and the same bond shall hold good for all the ten cases. There shall be two sureties who shall execute the bond for Rs.1,00,000/- which bond shall hold good for all the ten cases. It is clarified that the personal bond so executed by the applicant and the bond so executed by the two sureties shall hold good for all the ten cases.
7. With the above directions, this application is disposed of finally.
Order Date :- 2.5.2025 Nitin Verma Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad