[2025:RJ-JP:15891-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 231/2025 In D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.663/2015 Prakash Garg S/o Late Shri Sooraj Kiran Garg, Aged About 76 Years, R/o 84/130, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. Krishna Kunal, Secretary, School Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Ashish Modi, Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner 3. Shri Naresh Singhal, General Secretary, Management Committee Shri Agarwal Shiksha Samiti, Agrasen Katla, Agra Road, Jaipur 4. Manju Sharma, Chief District Education, Secondary Education, Shiksha Sankul, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur 5. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, School Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Bhardwaj HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 09/04/2025 1. The contempt petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of an order passed by this Court on 06.11.2015. 2. The order passed by this Court was a judgment in rem. 3. The respondents shall consider the case of the petitioner. Instead of issuing notice on contempt, we are inclined to dispose of this petition with a direction that the case of the petitioner shall also be examined in terms of order dated 01.12.2021 passed by this Court in the case of Shri Banwari Lal Bhukar & Anr. vs. Anoop Khinchi & Ors.-D.B. Civil Contempt Petition [2025:RJ-JP:15891-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-231/2025] No.740/2016 and other connected matters wherein this Court had given detailed directions as below:- “1. It shall be an obligation on the part of the Commissioner, College Education to immediately release the dues payable to the petitioners as per the directions issued by this Court from time to time and the directions which have already been issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 09.09.2021 in the case of State of Rajasthan Versus Manju Saxena & Ors., Special Leave to Appeal (c) No.13791/2019, wherein, the Hon’ble Supreme Court had directed compliance to be made within a period of eight weeks. 2. A brief, but clear order regarding compliance of the order in respect of each of the contempt petitioners will have to be passed by the concerned Directorate within a period of ten weeks from today. 3. The orders in respect of each of the contempt petitioners, which are required to be passed clearly stating compliance of the order, shall be reported directly to the Registry of this Court, which shall be placed before this Court under a separate registered case. 4. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this contempt petition, at this stage, is disposed off, however, with liberty to revive, if any grievance still remains unredressed.” 4. All the authorities including the Secretariat of the Department of School Education and Secondary Education as also the private school educational institution officials shall be under an obligation to provide necessary information, if any demanded by Directorate of Secondary Education and School Education, towards compliance of the order which was passed earlier by this Court and in the case referred to hereinabove. 5. Contempt petition stands disposed off accordingly. (ANAND SHARMA),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ RAJAT/PCG/20