103 Suppl IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CRM (M) No. 665/2025 CrlM No. 1655/2025 Barkat Ali Bhat ….. Petitioner (s) Through: Mr. Saqib Shabir, Adv. V/s Mudasir Ahmad Pandit ….. Respondent(s) Through: Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar, Judge ORDER 29.10.2025 1. The petitioner, through the medium of present petition is, seeking a direction upon the court of Additional Sessions Judge, Budgam to decide the revision petition filed by the respondent against orders dated 13.09.2023, 03.10.2023, 16.10.2023 and 01.11.2023 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class (Sub Judge) Chadoora in case titled Barkat Ali Bhat Vs. Mudasir Ahmad Pandit. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the aforesaid orders passed by the learned trial Magistrate have been stayed by the learned Sessions Judge vide order dated 04.11.2023 but the revision P a g e | 2 CRM (M) No. 665/2025 CrlM No. 1655/2025 petition is not being finally decided despite lapse of about 2 years, though the same is ripe for final hearing. 3. Having regard to the limited nature of the prayer that has been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition can be disposed at this stage itself by extending appropriate direction to the learned revisional court. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned revisional court to decide and dispose of the revision petition titled Mudasir Ahmad Pandit Vs. Barkat Ali Bhat (File No. 79/revision) most expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date a copy of this order is made available to the said court. 5. Disposed of as above. 6. A copy of this order be sent to learned Additional Sessions Judge, Budgam. (Sanjay Dhar) Judge SRINAGAR 29.10.2025 Aasif