ALTAF HUSSAIN MALIK v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS
WP(C)/1273/2025 · 2025-12-30
Sanjay Dhar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10538 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10538 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 96 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR (Through virtual mode)
Case: - WP(C) No. 1273/2025
Altaf Hussain Malik …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Waseem Ramzan Lone, Advocate
V/s
UT of J&K and ors. …. Respondent(s) Through: None
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 30.12.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to pursue the writ petition as he has been assured by the respondents that his grievances will be redressed. His statement is taken on record. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with leave and liberty to approach this Court afresh if the cause survives.
(SANJAY DHAR)
JUDGE
Jammu 30.12.2025 Raj Kumar
Raj Kumar 2025.12.31 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document