Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:138550 Court No. - 89 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 36104 of 2024 Applicant :- Jitendra Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bhaiya Lal Yadav,Dharm Narain Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Raj Bihari Hon'ble Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2/complainant and learned AGA for the State. 2. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred for quashing of the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1395 of 2016 (State Vs. Jaychand & others), under Sections 323, 324, 427, 504, 506, 308 IPC as well as Charge Sheet No. 81 of 2015 dated 31.12.2015 submitted in Case Crime No. 219 of 2014, P.S. Saraimamrej, District Prayagraj and taking cognizance order dated 17.05.2016, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 6, Allahabad and further prayed to stay the aforesaid proceedings. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the dispute between the parties is civil dispute and during mediation, both the parties have amicably settled all the disputes and they have agreed for withdrawal of all cases, including present case, pending between the parties. All the conditions of mediation have been complied with. It was submitted that the complainant does not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has concurred with the arguments of learned counsel for the applicant and submitted that both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and compromised the matter and the complainant/ opposite party no.2 does not want to proceed with the case pending before the trial court and the impugned proceedings may be quashed. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if parties compromise the matter. 6. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 7. It is well settled that in appropriate cases criminal proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise. In the instant case, matter relates to civil dispute and it was submitted that both the parties have settled all the disputes and compromised the matter. The dispute between the parties is civil in nature and it was submitted on behalf of both the parties that impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise between the parties. If parties compromise the matter, it would not have adverse impact on society. There is nothing to indicate that parties have any criminal antecedents. The counter affidavit of opposite party no.2 is also on record, wherein it has been stated that the impugned proceedings may be quashed. Considering the law laid down in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed. 8. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1395 of 2016 (State Vs. Jaychand & others), under Sections 323, 324, 427, 504, 506, 308 IPC as well as Charge Sheet No. 81 of 2015 dated 31.12.2015 submitted in Case Crime No. 219 of 2014, P.S. Saraimamrej, District Prayagraj and taking cognizance order dated 17.05.2016, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 6, Allahabad, against applicant, namely, Jitendra Yadav, are hereby quashed. 9. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed. Order Date :- 13.8.2025 Nisha Digitally signed by :- nisha kumari High Court of Judicature at Allahabad