INDRA SINGH SON OF SHRI HARLAL SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
HC/71/2025 · 2025-04-02
Inderjeet Singh, Mukesh Rajpurohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10530 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10530 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:14799-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 71/2025 Indra Singh Son Of Shri Harlal Singh, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 12, Khem Chand Ki Dhani, Dhamora, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking, Unit Jaipur (Raj.)
4. Superintendent Of Police, Jhunjhunu District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
5. S.h.o. Of Police Station Gudha, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
6. Lokesh Singh Son Of Shri Sultan Singh, Resident Of Godaron Ka Bas, Singnor, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sharda Bai Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG assisted by Mr. Aman Kumar. Ms. Neha Goyal Mr. Ram Manohar, SHO, (P.S Gudha Goudgi) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT Judgment 02/04/2025
1. Heard.
2. The corpus, on having been recovered, has been produced today before this Court by Mr. Ram Manohar (SHO), Police Station Gudha Goudgi, District Jhunjhunu. The date of birth of the corpus
[2025:RJ-JP:14799-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-71/2025] as reflected from the record is 13.05.2008, meaning thereby the corpus is minor, below 18 years of age, which is affirmed by the petitioner as well as learned GA-cum-AAG.
3. We have interacted with the corpus and she has stated before this Court that she wants to go and live with her father (petitioner), who is along with his counsel are personally present in the Court.
4. The corpus is permitted to go with her father (petitioner). The concerned Police Officer is directed that no harm should be caused by any person to the corpus, while going with her father (petitioner).
5. In that view of the matter, the present habeas corpus petition stands disposed of.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J DIKSHA MISHRA /1 c