Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:53597-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35542 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ramakant Yadav Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ganesh Mani,Sugandha Yadav,Vinod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- Jawahir Yadav,C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated 10.08.2024 filed by the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided.
4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent no.2 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the respondent no. 2/Regional Transport Officer, Azamgarh is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 11.4.2025 Abhishek Sri. (Dr. Y.K.Srivastava,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK RANJAN SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad