IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4662 of 2025 Date of decision: 01.04.2025 Bhavna. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev K. Motta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner’s previous representation filed pursuant to decision rendered in Bhavna vs. State of H.P. & Ors.1, was rejected by the respondents on 06.06.2024 as at that time the petitioner had not completed her normal tenure at GSSS Daraon Deveria, District Sirmour, a rural area. 1CWP No.3385 of 2024 decided on 26.04.2024. 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes -2- 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as on date petitioner has completed her normal tenure at the aforesaid remote rural area, whereafter, she preferred a representation on 23.02.2025 (Annexure P-1) to respondent No.2. Petitioner’s grievance is that aforesaid representation has not been decided by respondent No.2/competent authority till date. 4. Looking to the nature of the grievance raised in this writ petition, it would in the interest of justice to direct respondent No.2/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation (Annexure P-1) of the petitioner in accordance with law and as per applicable policy within a period of six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1st April, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)