APHC010119902019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5367/2019 Between: D.SHYAM SUNDAR REDDY, S/O. D.SHANKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (QC), AP EDUCATION AND WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, R/O. D.NO.8-301-37, LAKSHMI NAGAR, SHAIKPET, HYDERABAD. TEMPORARILY RESIDING AT VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SCHOOL EDUCATION (TRG) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE A P EDUCATION AND WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL ROAD, D.NO.5-6-59/6/ 1, CHITTI NAGAR, LAMBADIPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 3. N NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, PRESENTLY KEPT INCHARGE AS SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, AP EDUCATION AND WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. M VIJAY KUMAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, KEPT AS INCHARGE TO THE POST OF SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER AT KADAPA CIRCLE, AP EDUCATION AND WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, KADAPA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. O MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) 2. G V S KISHORE KUMAR 3. R V MALLIKARJUNA RAO 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing G.O.Ms.No.47 dated 23.08.2018 in so far showing the 3rd respondent at Sl.No.2 and the consequential proceedings issued in GORt.No.356 dated 23.11.2018 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents No.1 and 2 to place the petitioner as incharge Superintending, Engineer.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri O.Manohar Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the matter may be disposed of as the relief sought by the Petitioner has become infructuous. 3. Sri R.V.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Government Pleader for School Education would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed as the relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:23.04.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.5367 of 2019 Dt.23.04.2025 Dinesh